Dear user, changes will soon be made to Orfeo. We will undertake the migration to a new version, another environment (and therefore a new URL: https://orfeo.belnet.be/) and another provider. Belnet will take over the management of Orfeo in the future. For you, this means that no changes, modifications or uploads can be made to the database Orfeo from the 1st of December 2021 to the 10th of December 2021. The database remains available for consultation. From the 10th of December 2021 onwards, you can reach Orfeo via the new url https://orfeo.belenet.be/. Our apologies for the inconvenience.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRoscoe, H.K.
dc.contributor.authorVan Roozendael, M.
dc.contributor.authorFayt, C.
dc.contributor.authorDu Piesanie, A.
dc.contributor.authorAbuhassan, N.
dc.contributor.authorAdams, C.
dc.contributor.authorAkrami, M.
dc.contributor.authorCede, A.
dc.contributor.authorChong, J.
dc.contributor.authorClémer, K.
dc.contributor.authorFriess, U.
dc.contributor.authorGil Ojeda, M.
dc.contributor.authorGoutail, F.
dc.contributor.authorGraves, R.
dc.contributor.authorGriesfeller, A.
dc.contributor.authorGrossmann, K.
dc.contributor.authorHemerijckx, G.
dc.contributor.authorHendrick, F.
dc.contributor.authorHerman, J.
dc.contributor.authorHermans, C.
dc.contributor.authorIrie, H.
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, P.V.
dc.contributor.authorKanaya, Y.
dc.contributor.authorKreher, K.
dc.contributor.authorLeigh, R.
dc.contributor.authorMerlaud, A.
dc.contributor.authorMount, G.H.
dc.contributor.authorNavarro, M.
dc.contributor.authorOetjen, H.
dc.contributor.authorPazmino, A.
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Camacho, M.
dc.contributor.authorPeters, E.
dc.contributor.authorPinardi, G.
dc.contributor.authorPuentedura, O.
dc.contributor.authorRichter, A.
dc.contributor.authorSchönhardt, A.
dc.contributor.authorShaiganfar, R.
dc.contributor.authorSpinei, E.
dc.contributor.authorStrong, K.
dc.contributor.authorTakashima, H.
dc.contributor.authorVlemmix, T.
dc.contributor.authorVrekoussis, M.
dc.contributor.authorWagner, T.
dc.contributor.authorWittrock, F.
dc.contributor.authorYela, M.
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, S.
dc.contributor.authorBoersma, F.
dc.contributor.authorHains, J.
dc.contributor.authorKroon, M.
dc.contributor.authorPiters, A.
dc.contributor.authorKim, Y.J.
dc.date2010
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-31T12:16:17Z
dc.date.available2016-03-31T12:16:17Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://orfeo.kbr.be/handle/internal/3214
dc.descriptionIn June 2009, 22 spectrometers from 14 institutes measured tropospheric and stratospheric NO2 from the ground for more than 11 days during the Cabauw Intercomparison Campaign of Nitrogen Dioxide measuring Instruments (CINDI), at Cabauw, NL (51.97° N, 4.93° E). All visible instruments used a common wavelength range and set of cross sections for the spectral analysis. Most of the instruments were of the multi-axis design with analysis by differential spectroscopy software (MAX-DOAS), whose non-zenith slant columns were compared by examining slopes of their least-squares straight line fits to mean values of a selection of instruments, after taking 30-min averages. Zenith slant columns near twilight were compared by fits to interpolated values of a reference instrument, then normalised by the mean of the slopes of the best instruments. For visible MAX-DOAS instruments, the means of the fitted slopes for NO 2 and O4 of all except one instrument were within 10% of unity at almost all non-zenith elevations, and most were within 5%. Values for UV MAX-DOAS instruments were almost as good, being 12% and 7%, respectively. For visible instruments at zenith near twilight, the means of the fitted slopes of all instruments were within 5% of unity. This level of agreement is as good as that of previous intercomparisons, despite the site not being ideal for zenith twilight measurements. It bodes well for the future of measurements of tropospheric NO2, as previous intercomparisons were only for zenith instruments focussing on stratospheric NO2, with their longer heritage. © 2010 Author(s).
dc.languageeng
dc.titleIntercomparison of slant column measurements of NO2 and O4 by MAX-DOAS and zenith-sky UV and visible spectrometers
dc.typeArticle
dc.subject.frascatiEarth and related Environmental sciences
dc.audienceScientific
dc.subject.freeinstrumentation
dc.subject.freemeasurement method
dc.subject.freenitrogen dioxide
dc.subject.freesoftware
dc.subject.freespectral analysis
dc.subject.freespectrometer
dc.subject.freespectroscopy
dc.subject.freestratosphere
dc.subject.freetroposphere
dc.subject.freeultraviolet radiation
dc.subject.freewavelength
dc.source.titleAtmospheric Measurement Techniques
dc.source.volume3
dc.source.issue6
dc.source.page1629-1646
Orfeo.peerreviewedYes
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/amt-3-1629-2010
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84862833539


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record